Partly Cloudy, 64°
Sources report that Comparative Literature student Jarvis Albright ’24.5 was declaring similarities between one book and another book.
“It’s clear that these texts beg to be compared,” said Albright, introducing his latest academic insight. “For one, they’re both books. I think that’s significant.”
“Further, each book uses words to communicate its ideas,” Albright continued, rapidly scanning back and forth between the books. “And borrowing the framework of word-usage established by the first book, one can better understand the other book’s similar use of words.”
“And yet it’s interesting how each book uses paragraphs, and compiles those paragraphs into chapters,” concluded Albright. “And in either case, these chapters come together to form what is ultimately a book. So, in conclusion, these are both books.”
At press time, Albright declared that while these books share plenty of similarities, they also have a few differences.
